How Psych twitter solves anything: "Not sure about the analysis in this paper" "Just use Bayes" "I'm not sure that's" "Bayes" "But" "BAYES"
-
-
Replying to @PsyBrief
meanwhile, the hardcore frequentists are all likepic.twitter.com/V9VJKGrGhB
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @GwilymLockwood @PsyBrief
(I actually like Bayesian analyses a lot of the time, but I've been looking for an excuse to post that picture for ages)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GwilymLockwood
Same I'm going to learn it once I'm confident with R. It's a great meme glad I could provide the situation for it to be used
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PsyBrief @GwilymLockwood
we're doing the Kruschke/puppies book - def recommend
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @GwilymLockwood
Thanks for the recommendation, will definitely check it out. PS Thought 1 of the authors was called Puppies haha
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @PsyBrief @GwilymLockwood
in all seriousness though I think it's the best/definitive book
3:43 AM - 22 Jul 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.