that's a shame, there's some very good stuff there!
-
-
-
not in any of my areas...
-
tbh I just can't read them... Just can't... Every time I even start something really off-putting is said
-
I'm not saying I never read them = prescriptive stance. I'm saying descriptively, my skimming of them never ends in full read.
-
ah, ok. Even as editor there's stuff I don't agree with, but if sufficient rigour in methods, I like to see it published.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but the formatting is so nice in html
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
me neither. And increasingly, rarely read Nature.
-
the former always has something turbo weird about it, the latter not sure just a bit too poppy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I gave up indexing them by RSS ages ago. I will occasionally skim if interesting or relevant one pops up on twitter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.