My biggest personal issue w peer rev's been use of insulting lang. 2/2've had verbal abuse so far.
-
-
That is awful. So sorry. My biggest issue with it is the time it wastes (work-time and elapsed time)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Would love to see wht happns to journal without peer review. Or only works iff system-wide?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Can't tell yet. Experiments like F1000 Research, ScienceOpen, are encouraging.
1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Check any paper on SO Research - all comments civil, constructive, and critical - it works :)
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
the mor I thnk abt it the mor I want to know: are they are cited like "typical" journal pubs - stats?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Science_Open and
like = as much as. I know we dislike impact factors, but metrics are needed of some type, right?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Science_Open and
Our authors have reported their Winnower pubs to be cited more than their trad. articles.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @theWinnower @o_guest and
the Winnower Retweeted Richard N. Landers
the Winnower added,
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @theWinnower
Google Scholar counts it in my h-index, too
@theWinnower@o_guest@Science_Open@MikeTaylor@Villavelius1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
good to know - that's actually pretty cool of the big G
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.