Worries me that pubs with high altmetrics = often crappy. Obv doesn't mean peer rev = not broken.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @MikeTaylor and
My biggest personal issue w peer rev's been use of insulting lang. 2/2've had verbal abuse so far.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That is awful. So sorry. My biggest issue with it is the time it wastes (work-time and elapsed time)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Would love to see wht happns to journal without peer review. Or only works iff system-wide?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Can't tell yet. Experiments like F1000 Research, ScienceOpen, are encouraging.
1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Check any paper on SO Research - all comments civil, constructive, and critical - it works :)
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
would it help me get a job just as much as any other pub?
this worries me a lot2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The safe bet is to assume they won't; but not everyone is playing safe, e.g. https://emckiernan.wordpress.com/pledge/
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Not everybody has the privilege to play it "safe"...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Do you mean "the privilege NOT to play it safe"?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
yeah haha I a word
-
-
HAR!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I do like this pledge though and will try and do try to do similar things and generally be good.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.