`@overleaf VS @authorea VS @sharelatex - which best? I have used the first & last only for collab'ly writing papers, not convinced any diff.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
Think overleaf more active than sharelatex for pure latex. Authorea interestingly different - md, html. Not convinced by any yet.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Most interesting Authorea feature is Jupyter notebook integration. For plain LaTeX editing, Overleaf is easier.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
I found overleaf a lot harder than sharelatex... only used each once for actual collab, but sharelatex for just-me projs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Don't overlook the "plain GitHub" option for collaborating. If everyone is familiar with git, it avoids a lot of trouble.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Tools like
@overleaf that try to swipe edit conflicts under the rug become a real pain sooner or later.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
they also make it way more opaque as to who did what
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the prob is when you collaborate with senior people who value their time and will not learn git just for you1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
how would you even start to convince them? githuband git have overheads and for them it's not worth it 2/2
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Git is definitely too hard for just writing papers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
yes and no, I write everything using git if not collaborating or before collaborating
-
-
it's better for me to chuck paper/writeup in a directory with the model on github for example, than dropbox or something
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.