ah! Was your phd in philosophy of semantic cognition?
-
-
hmm or "temporal dynamics of reasoning." from your website... How did that tie in with semcog?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Nope, I'm no philosopher! My PhD used mouse tracking to explore conflict in reasoning, including induction. [1...]
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TraversEoin @o_guest
[2...]Part of this pitted different kinds of knowledge (similarity, associations, casual relationships, etc.) against each other...
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @TraversEoin @o_guest
[3..]in an induction task and seeing what influenced mouse movements, when. I wanted to formally model...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TraversEoin @o_guest
[4/4]...different kinds of knowledge, but in the end just asked people for association ratings.</abstract> Some day, though!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TraversEoin
I almost but not 100% immediately realised it's the peripheral haha.
Yeah, that sounds cool, so are mouse movements [1/2]1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @TraversEoin
analysed like eye-tracking in some ways?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest
For the Cognition paper, exactly! For all the other stuff (in submission/preperation) its more like "changes of mind", you know?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TraversEoin @o_guest
Main point is that reasoning is a process over time, and different info/knowledge drives it at different points in time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
