Haha. Nice halo. Reminds me of the halo-effect (extending 1 negative attribution to entire personality). :)
-
-
Replying to @lakens @neuroconscience
sounds like a good heuristic in certain cases
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I've seen some pretty questionable stuff but i'm pretty sure generalizing before we have the facts is counterproductive
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @lakens
I think his posts are creepy. That's specific. Asking if I am angry is dangerous/misleading/a common tactic online.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Suddenly i'm using 'tactics'?? Do you think I have an agenda here other than: being even handed and pro science?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @lakens
I expressed my view on 2 tweets (evidence) and you went for my emotional state - kind of weird way to go about it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
this doesn't seem to be going anywhere constructive so i'm bowing out. Emotions are an important part of decisions.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
if asking in earnest if you might be pre-judging on the basis of (probably righteous) anger offends you, I apologize.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @lakens
Tbh, I'm not personally offended. But it's offensive, sure. Critically, it has an inherent *gendered* element.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I suspected that was where you were going with this, so like I said, i'm out of this convo.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Also the valence of my emotions has nothing to do with the evidence I linked to. FWIW I'm pretty chilled about it.
-
-
The decision I made was "those two tweets are/make me feel creepy/creeped-out" So implicitly you knew my state.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.