not surprised and also not sure if that actually counts as "casual" in my books
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @neuroconscience
An important lesson I've learned is not to try to guess what someone means, but just ask. Would apply it here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest @neuroconscience
Haha. Nice halo. Reminds me of the halo-effect (extending 1 negative attribution to entire personality). :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lakens @neuroconscience
sounds like a good heuristic in certain cases
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I've seen some pretty questionable stuff but i'm pretty sure generalizing before we have the facts is counterproductive
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @lakens
I think his posts are creepy. That's specific. Asking if I am angry is dangerous/misleading/a common tactic online.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Suddenly i'm using 'tactics'?? Do you think I have an agenda here other than: being even handed and pro science?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @lakens
I expressed my view on 2 tweets (evidence) and you went for my emotional state - kind of weird way to go about it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
you said that generalizing from two tweets to a person's views or character is a 'useful heuristic'
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, that's twitter/laconic probs. I said that it's a useful heuristic in certain cases. Maybe it is here, mayb not.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
