@Villavelius @BrainStraining To clarify: "knowledge sharing" prob doesn't suffer much - but science in general prob a small amount, yes.
-
-
@o_guest@BrainStraining By a small amount, yes. If they get more funding on the basis of inflated publication lists, funders are complicit. -
@o_guest@BrainStraining Which is truly sad. -
@o_guest@BrainStraining And I'm certainly not a fan of sneaky self-plagiarism. Openness/transparency is required in all science publishing. -
@Villavelius@BrainStraining This is obviously super sneaky & they probably would have been in trouble if it had been a more recent case... -
@o_guest@BrainStraining Different times. Ante-#openaccess. Maybe they felt they needed to enlarge their audience. -
@Villavelius@BrainStraining who doesn't though..? -
@o_guest@BrainStraining Here you go. You know the trick now :-) -
@Villavelius@BrainStraining Im sensing sarcasm even a hint of patronising tone. I dont agree tht because u feel something u can bend rules. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.