@o_guest @BrainStraining "Kohones!", I'd say. I do pity the librarians with subscriptions to more than one of those journals, though.
-
-
Replying to @Villavelius
@o_guest@BrainStraining The author order is different in these! Nice little "attention enhancement circle". Less problematic if all#OA tho1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Villavelius
@Villavelius@BrainStraining but the text is identical except for a few words here and there- so it's not really 4 articles: it's the same 11 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
@o_guest@BrainStraining I realise. But main problem is that librarians pay four times, in my view.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Villavelius
@Villavelius@BrainStraining very money-based/utilitarian stance (?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
@o_guest@BrainStraining Has science itself really been compromised?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Villavelius
@Villavelius@BrainStraining it depends what you mean - they definitely are affecting their employability/fundability (in)directly2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
@o_guest@BrainStraining It's a question of gaming a system. The real problem is that the science communication system is so easily gamed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest
@o_guest@BrainStraining But I don't think science/knowledge sharing has suffered. Have a look at this:http://blog.scielo.org/en/2015/10/29/science-which-needs-communication-first-careers-which-need-selectivity-later/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Villavelius @BrainStraining No, I agree with you there.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.