@Villavelius @BrainStraining so it's cool (in your opinion) even if it's against the rules of the journal(s)?
-
-
@o_guest@BrainStraining No, if you submit you should play by the rules. But the journals/publishers should police that. -
@Villavelius@BrainStraining not the readers too? -
@o_guest@BrainStraining Perhaps. Republishing for same audience not very clever. Librarians paid too much cash, readers too much attention. -
@Villavelius@BrainStraining I don't understand why this (self-plagiarism) is being qualified (uniquely) in cash. -
@o_guest@BrainStraining Because that's the main concrete problem. Not much of a problem as far as scientific progress is concerned. -
@Villavelius@BrainStraining I think there is where we might disagree. Because even though a lot is not zero sum, funding kind of sadly is. -
@Villavelius@BrainStraining To clarify: "knowledge sharing" prob doesn't suffer much - but science in general prob a small amount, yes. -
@o_guest@BrainStraining By a small amount, yes. If they get more funding on the basis of inflated publication lists, funders are complicit. - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.