@o_guest sadly that seems to be most of academia. Have one idea that struck a chord and then play the same sing ad nauseum..
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
@o_guest@BrainStraining Mail the editors? This is at best suspicious!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chbergma
@chbergma@BrainStraining Do you think worth it? I wonder if tagging@ElsevierConnect and@IEEEorg might help. I don't know what to think...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
@o_guest@BrainStraining Absolutely think it's worth it. Sad it wasn't caught by reviewers, but then... Or write post pub peer review?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chbergma
@chbergma@BrainStraining Not sure what I'd write other than: "I think these 4 are the same paper. Keep the last one because it's clearest."1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @czzpr
@BrainStraining@o_guest Tend to disagree, A short notification hurts noone and cleans up record. Why artificially inflate output, too.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chbergma
@chbergma@BrainStraining No, I agree with you Christina. I just don't know what the protocol is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
@o_guest@BrainStraining Don't think there is one, I suggest an informal mail to the editor with example paragraphs / all suspicious papers.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@chbergma @BrainStraining But that sounds like effort! 
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
@o_guest@BrainStraining Then leave out the example paragraphs? ;)0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.