Is this really the crux of it? People upset that a WOC said ‘white women white womaning’ on Twitter? This is the bullying racism all these senior people are bravely defending us from? Because damn, son. You are just in the wrong here and there’s just no way round that for youhttps://twitter.com/psychrabble/status/1152889764804222976 …
-
-
Replying to @PsychScientists
If you are going on the attack, at least get your facts straight. That response was to a white guy who played this dignified card:pic.twitter.com/oRGoCesCr9
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @PsychRabble
I read the full thread. This was the tweet where you identified what you thought was ‘toxic’ and worth all the nastiness you’ve been engaged in. It’s a wildly inadequate excuse
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @PsychScientists
You mean nastiness like inviting her to a civil discussion? Or nastiness like asking people to provide evidence of nastiness?
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @PsychRabble
Serious question: is all this twitter activity about that one sentence?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @PsychScientists
Iris van Rooij Retweeted Iris van Rooij
First it was 5+ days rage about one word (see below) and after that a few days rage about the phrase "white women white womaning". https://twitter.com/IrisVanRooij/status/1151960828045877248?s=20 … When I blocked him (1.5 years ago) the rage was also about one word: sealioning
Iris van Rooij added,
Iris van Rooij @IrisVanRooijHow does a male prof who believes that#bropenscience is a “sexist slur” explain to himself that many of his male colleagues responding to him are not offended? He does not seem to have moved an inch on his untenable position, despite serious engagement for more than 5 days.Show this thread1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
Fragile.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.