Wouldn’t surprise me if argument by exhaustion is in the top 10 of argumentation styles in #bropensciencehttps://twitter.com/bradpwyble/status/1150962662945239042 …
-
-
I had these so far: Argument by ... 1 Exhaustion 2 Sealioning 3 Mansplaining 4 Digging deeper /Doubling Down 5 Both sideism / False Equivalence 6 Reverse sexism/racism 7 Privilege 8 Stipulation 9 Trolling I’m sure there are more & feel we need a bingo. Like the replyguys.
-
Reply guy stuff surely overlaps a lot too?
-
I think we can use one that is a bit more finegrained and focussed on repeated fallacious, destructive, and derailing** ways of arguing (like the malaria example, or the trade-off, or the ‘surely these problems are independent of ‘inclusivity’ etc). **I forgot: 10. Derailing
-
Oh yes and we have seen (11) argument from Lack of Imagination in action the last few days:https://twitter.com/irisvanrooij/status/1150791445147791362?s=21 …
-
Though the Argument from Privilege I felt was most insidious: “Some people care about diversity & inclusity, others less so, and that is OK” Well, yes, if you are a f****ing CWM it is yes.pic.twitter.com/xzoyb14l46
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and the award for coming up with the most amazingly awesome terms goes to
@o_guest
-
I can't take credit for JAQing off!
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.