I don't think it's fair or useful to call the diversity workshop at SIPS the bropen science working group (if I understand you correctly), nor to call their product the bropen science document.
-
-
Replying to @bradpwyble @VandekerckhoveJ and
It was their term. Much of it violates the first principle of the COC (as well as the harassment proscriptions): "SIPS is dedicated to diversity, equity, inclusion, and the free expression of ideas."
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @PsychRabble @VandekerckhoveJ and
What do you mean "it was their term". Do you mean that they called themselves the bropen science working group? I'm just trying to understand. The term bropen science was Introuduced on Twitter over a year ago
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bradpwyble @VandekerckhoveJ and
This document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15cIXHSuGxHZkYyFKbV2HbcA_paaqEP_G93-WQ-LQ93Y/edit# … Was produced by/at SIPS. 1/2 or 3 ending in END.
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @PsychRabble @VandekerckhoveJ and
Ok, thanks. As I said, the term was not introduced at SIPS but has been in use for about a year, maybe 1.5. I don't think the diversity panels would want their session known as the bropen science working group.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bradpwyble @PsychRabble and
FWIW, my recollection is that the brief pitch for the diversity unconference at the 9am Tuesday pitch session did in fact include the B word, along the lines of (and here my memory is less clear) "If you want to discuss <short list of issues, including the B word>, come along".
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sTeamTraen @PsychRabble and
Sure, but that's not the same as saying it was their term. They included it in a list of topics that were discussed.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bradpwyble @PsychRabble and
That wasn't quite the impression that I got, but I'm happy to acknowledge that we're very much into subjective territory here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sTeamTraen @bradpwyble and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
I made it up like 2 years ago...https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1150011993157439493?s=19 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @sTeamTraen and
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted
And Lee also knows I did. He's in fact mentioned me having it made it up last time somebody told me he was talking about it. https://twitter.com/PsychRabble/status/1086309467589959680 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Also they asked me if they could use it at SIPS and credited me. So I'm not sure why you think they tried to confuse anybody?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
Nick Brown Retweeted Brad Wyble
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I mentioned it in reply to Brad's point (https://twitter.com/bradpwyble/status/1149914789075927041 …), to suggest that the B term appeared to me at the time to have some salience for the people organising the diversity group. (FWIW, I don't regard "bropen science" as a slur.)
Nick Brown added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sTeamTraen @o_guest and
Yea, a few things got conflated in that thread. Lee was making several points in rapid succession.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.