“value [..] the participation [of] a wide variety of ethnicities, genders”
So strange to blog about without giving credit to those who push for diversity in #openscience both in terms of the definition and in terms of people:
https://twitter.com/kirstie_j/status/1138422306064257024?s=21 …
https://twitter.com/daniellecrobins/status/1072936157493649408 …https://twitter.com/talyarkoni/status/1150115120116326403 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @o_guest
can you elaborate on your concern? I also didn't review the history of people equating open science with metascience, or public critique, or any of the other elements I mention. it's a short position post that expresses views that, to judge by twitter, are extremely commonplace.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @talyarkoni @o_guest
if you think there's value in adding a disclaimer at the top of the post saying "none of these ideas are new, and virtually all have been expressed hundreds of thousands of times by many people in many settings", I'm happy to—though I think it's pretty obvious from the context.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @talyarkoni @o_guest
and regarding the specific things you cite, I was not at the OHBM open science symposium, and didn't see
@kirstie_j's talk. I think Kirstie does great work on this, but so do any number of other people. my post was not a historical review; I simply *listed* different elements.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
and I am sure
@daniellecrobins also does amazing work, but I'm fairly certain your tweet is the first time I've come across her, so it would have been hard to credit her even if my post *was* an overview of diversity efforts (which, again, it was not).1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Sure add the disclaimer. Up to you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
well, if it's up to me, I won't, because I think it's pretty obvious from the context. but I'm willing to do it if other people think it adds value and prevents misunderstanding. do you think it would add value?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Yes and no. Ultimately it's about being open about what you're presenting as your or "your" ideas. If you think everything you've written about in that blog post is derivative or has already been said then maybe there's a value in making that clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
do you think anyone reading my post is at risk of coming away thinking "Yarkoni introduced the idea that diversity is part of open science," given that the context diversity comes up in is a list of things that people are currently using open science to refer to?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Two kinds of diversities I've and you've mentioned in this thread. I think the answer is "yes" to at least one of them being seen as "yours".
-
-
okay. I added a postscript. thanks for the feedback.
0 replies 0 retweets 5 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.