“value [..] the participation [of] a wide variety of ethnicities, genders”
So strange to blog about without giving credit to those who push for diversity in #openscience both in terms of the definition and in terms of people:
https://twitter.com/kirstie_j/status/1138422306064257024?s=21 …
https://twitter.com/daniellecrobins/status/1072936157493649408 …https://twitter.com/talyarkoni/status/1150115120116326403 …
Yes and no. Ultimately it's about being open about what you're presenting as your or "your" ideas. If you think everything you've written about in that blog post is derivative or has already been said then maybe there's a value in making that clear.
-
-
do you think anyone reading my post is at risk of coming away thinking "Yarkoni introduced the idea that diversity is part of open science," given that the context diversity comes up in is a list of things that people are currently using open science to refer to?
-
Two kinds of diversities I've and you've mentioned in this thread. I think the answer is "yes" to at least one of them being seen as "yours".
-
okay. I added a postscript. thanks for the feedback.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.