Help me out here tweeps: Assuming all other things being equal and an appropriate project, etc., a finishing PhD student with 8 pub'd papers (2 as 1st author) would be a strong contender for pretty much any post-doc position, right? That's a damn good CV for that stage, yes?
I can elaborate on what other lies I have seen, e.g., people saying they have experience in Python but admit in private they have never coded in Python. Same with git. Does this help clarify?
-
-
Also
@froukehe "What for one person are strong fMRI skills are rather limited to another." It's not so much about qualifying as strong or not, just the presence of having done it. More of a binary thing. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I mean using it in published work — something you can point to with evidence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Do you mean like why would anybody lie? Because it's in the required skills for the job. So no point applying (employment law doesn't allow you to interview them) if you don't fit the required stuff.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.