One major problem is that one has to strip away the math when teaching psych/lx people. This is very costly in terms of insight. What I do is replace the math with simulation; this seems to work somewhat.
-
-
Replying to @shravanvasishth
Sure. But psych isn’t the only quant subject and I would be fully shocked if anyone who do Econ or biostuff (at least trained in the last 20 Years) would be shocked about p-hacking or how to jot.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @dan_p_simpson @shravanvasishth
It’s not that they’ve not had problems. But to suggest that the people who spend their time solving these problems should be left out because people didn’t listen the first time is very bold.
1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @dan_p_simpson @shravanvasishth
End of story for me is that there is no field like psych for having a bunch of people confidently telling you wrong things a lot statistics. And no other field has a leader saying “we don’t need experts in statistics”. So why fucking bother? I am certainly not going to.
1 reply 4 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @dan_p_simpson @shravanvasishth
Anyway. If you want to prevent p-hacking, Clean your house and then hope for the best someone notices before the next preventable error. Or pay us. A lot. That’s what medicine did.
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @dan_p_simpson @shravanvasishth
And it’s never just a tweet. But this is the point where, give or take, I no longer care that academic psychologists are bad at their jobs. Shit the bed or shut up. I do not care. I’m focusing on other things.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @dan_p_simpson @shravanvasishth
If you want me to resume caring, give me a >250k tenured job.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dan_p_simpson @shravanvasishth
(I am cheaper when I don’t have to deal with things. By not that much cheaper.)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dan_p_simpson @shravanvasishth
But if what you need is CPD (and what you need is CPD) you should be prepared for it to be eye wateringly expensive.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @dan_p_simpson @shravanvasishth
Should anyone have any further questions on this, I am $300 per hour minimum 5 hours up front.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Part of the problem is IMHO the same as that which Lockhart talks about:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1145256509699514368 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
-
-
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
And another part is something people really should know better than to just openly say, but I guess we're in 2019:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1145249284939485185 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ @o_guestSocial Psych 1999: There’s an effect called Dunning-Kruger. Incompetent ppl are unable to recognize their own incompetence. SP 2011: Uh oh. We’ve a replication crisis. Maybe we’ve been doing stats wrongly? SP 2019: We don’t need expert statisticians to help us fix our subfield. https://twitter.com/dan_p_simpson/status/1145219937100865536 …0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.