Anyone ever get a manuscript rejected because the study "does not really add much" but then see similar and even weaker work published in the same journal the only difference being the final author is a much bigger name PI?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @PaulMinda1
There is only one solution: work on stuff that no one else, in particular no one who is clearly sane would work on. Same rejections. But without the big name annoyance.
4 replies 2 retweets 78 likes -
-
Yeah, this should be the norm - always throw it as a preprint first, even before the very first submission for peer review!!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @raamana_ @roydanroy and
It won't really matter though IMHO. The other paper might still get more coverage, respect, and citations.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @roydanroy and
Atleast it lets you and your friends cite it! Also providing irrefutable proof of being the first if that ever needed to be proven
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Sure. But is primacy the real quibble here?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @roydanroy and
May not be. It’s about mitigating damage! :)
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.