Anyone ever get a manuscript rejected because the study "does not really add much" but then see similar and even weaker work published in the same journal the only difference being the final author is a much bigger name PI?
-
-
Atleast it lets you and your friends cite it! Also providing irrefutable proof of being the first if that ever needed to be proven
-
Sure. But is primacy the real quibble here?
-
May not be. It’s about mitigating damage! :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.