I’m happy to engage in genuine debate, but honestly, my sense is that much of this is faux outrage directed at me as a means to express other grievances related to reproducibility. I have no interest in conflating these issues.
-
-
Sorry, I thought "ask permission" would then entail respecting a denial. So, if the journal editor says "no," it would be cool to publish or quote from the letter anyway?
-
-
But to be clear, yes, if they say "no" that means a new conversation. I haven't covered that. And I don't know if a general statement if they say "no" is possible. Case by case.
-
In this specific case, the editor very clearly stated he would have said "yes".
-
To be clear, my experiences with those who want to screw you over DO NOT want to have a conversation. They want to ignore you. Hence why I focused on an editor ignoring you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.