That’s not what happened here. I explicitly encourage criticism. I don’t appreciate being quoted w/out permission as a professional courtesy, which I’d have given.
-
-
Replying to @tage_rai @siminevazire and
I’m happy to engage in genuine debate, but honestly, my sense is that much of this is faux outrage directed at me as a means to express other grievances related to reproducibility. I have no interest in conflating these issues.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
I don’t expect that kind of privacy for my emails in my role as editor. I’d be curious to know why you do. What’s the purpose of wanting authors to ask for permission to share an official correspondence about their own paper? I think it’s a significant obstacle to accountability.
2 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @siminevazire @hardsci and
There was no obstacle. Their were no consequences in a professional sphere. If I refused to respond to an email that would be one thing. I stopped them from tweeting at me. Only ethics that apply on social media are personal preferences based on whatever criteria I choose.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Putting the blocking issue aside for a sec, you suggested there are ethical issues with sharing an editor’s official email about one’s own paper (even w/o reviews) - I strongly disagree and think that will deter others and take away an important avenue for accountability.
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @siminevazire @tage_rai and
The blocking exacerbates this concern because, if it was for this reason, it’s a signal to other authors that further deters them from using this avenue for accountability.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @siminevazire @tage_rai and
It sounds like the disagreement we have is about whether authors should be allowed to share their own decision letters w/o asking for permission. If the answer is no, then your block makes sense. I think it should clearly be yes. I’d be curious to hear reasons why it should be no
1 reply 0 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @siminevazire @tage_rai and
I don't really see any faux outrage here. Just a debate about a topical issue. I personally agree with
@siminevazire and@hardsci . In absence of explicit notice not to share decision letters, I see no reason at all not to. They're not "personal" emails - they're institutional1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @itjohnstone @siminevazire and
Why can't we ask permission if we are to share stuff publicly? If we really think something needs to be shared publicly, we can ask, and if ignored, we can still at least inform the person we're doing it, and then do it.
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @itjohnstone and
Ask/inform seems a pretty attainable bar without much downside.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
Also I find it a bit weird that nobody has as much irritation when people, male profs, in the same department/field as me block me on Twitter but when somebody does it to avoid interacting (in their opinion unprofessionally) they are told off?
-
-
Also I think a private email, which this is, will be the intellectual property of whoever writes it. So we can be sued especially in the USA where people are very litigious. Right?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.