I'm interested in the phenomenon whereby researchers find it more acceptable to omit results from a report (error of omission), or fail to publish a null result, than to make up data (error of commission). Is there an accepted term for this?
-
-
Or the idea/concept that even though we have laws (= formalisms) we still need to discuss things on a case-by-case basis (trials in law, discussion in science and life generally); the idea that laws/formalisms can be wrong even if super formal/mathematical; and more.
-
The idea that the people enforcing the laws (cops) could be awful while the laws could be OK.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
)?