Thank you, Remi. It's so weird to see people write preprints about this topic and confuse the two... I don't want to name and shame, but it's just disappointing. Do some research?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
In all fairness I am often responsible for not making that distinction clear enough because I assume people are aware of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RemiGau
Big difference though to what I have seen! I've never seen you say literally: Open science was created because scientists were making bad science in 2010. It's like "NO". Open science is way older.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Also I am not like some super old person who has been around for decades, but I *was* in London, at UCL, in the 2010s (and even a little before) and I know what happened and who started what. People more junior than me or others who were not there need to be careful because
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
twisting the facts and making things opaque with misinformation is serious and literally AGAINST being open!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I am not some all-knowing oracle type, I definitely don't know everything that happened and that's the point. Nobody is. Everybody can add their own correction so to speak and increase our understanding of events/science.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
But talking about stuff without being an expert in them is... well... anti-science?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
BTW I have this idea people, on Twitter, think I'm a lot younger than I am. Especially those who disagree with me. I find it really strange. They say things like that I finished my PhD like 1-2 years ago or something. It's nice. I guess I know how to moisturise my skin.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
And more than a few think I'm doing a PhD now. That would actually be nice TBH. Imagine if I had waited 10 years to do my PhD. It would have been such a nice ride. I'm so much more mature now. INB4: You're still pretty immature.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Ha reminds of a similar thing. I am old enough to remember the arrival of the PLOS journals and how quite a few people said that their idealism would be their doom. Replication issues were not even a thing at the time. Well except for those who had read Meehl and similar stuff..
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Ha, indeed. We have been around long enough to remember a time before science Twitter being a big deal. 
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
When I was a student in my second year I was told by one of the TA : "You should have a look at this new thing to search articles. It is called pubmeb. It is great."
#NotKidding#TheThingsWeTakeForGranted1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.