Scientists: Can we tests if female fertility affects men's linguistic choices? S: Yes, we can! S: We have an effect, but opposite to expected. Can we come up with a just-so story? S: Yes, we can! S: Can we publish it? S: Yes, we can! Me:pic.twitter.com/SqVxE4tOJk
-
Show this thread
-
And for those unaware how hetero- & cisnormative evo psych is & regularly excludes homosexuals or otherwise gender non-conforming ppl from their studies: "two participants who self-reported a homosexual orientation were excluded from the data analysis" (same for study 1 & 2)
6 replies 5 retweets 50 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij
Oh, evo psych? Is that even considered a science? I thought there was much speculation, and books and talks mostly for lay people.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @RoeliendenOuden
It sure is. You should make a good faith effort to understand it some day.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
And it should make a good faith effort to be less sexist.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
I think sexism is the most visible form of bias in evo psychology - at least to feminists. But of course, there are others.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Maybe being sexist is a mating strategy?
5 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Maybe woke virtue-signaling is a mating strategy?
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
What about being a cuck? Is that one too? 
-
-
-
Replying to @telescopicserie @o_guest and
What a shortsighted individual! Shame!
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.