Can explain more if needed, but as with all such systems it's both important you use git as intended (so it works without issue) and to find a way that you like using it.
-
-
Ha OK. I guess that if you take the formatting off in charge that makes the whole thing more appealing.
-
You can't realistically ask people to change their workflow without doing something in return! Basic psychology LMAO!

-
Yes it make sense but your workload must go through the roof, no? Though this is definitely a good way to become a latex wizard / enchantress.




-
I think it depends. I mean if they can start off just writing plain text in .tex files and then compiling them (say on
@overleaf) it's not a small step (esp. for scientists) to actually start learning on their own. -
And I mean really small deal if I have to show them how to do \citep[see:][]{Guest2017} (assuming natbib and APA style here) instead of whatever they have tried right?
-
I think that knowing that they can turn to someone for help to learn might be additional incentive. Esp that it can feel like a big step on your own but much less so when there is a person to demystify it and explain things in plain English.
-
TBF I think that is what coauthors and fellow lab members are for in the ideal case, so yes, absolutely.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

