The replication crisis is less a product of statistical illiteracy and more a product of a zero-sum academic job/grant market that favors metrics over thoughtful science. Self-policing is a technocratic band-aid; we need to organize against incentive structures imposed from abovehttps://twitter.com/HeuristicLineup/status/1125121874755604480 …
-
-
That too, but the big problem (to me) is that they're rational to do it in a market-driven system. I think most people want to do good science, but it hurts to constantly weigh good science against career. OpenSci DOES open new career paths, but don't resolve the original problem
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hehehe. But honestly, I hold you in high regard: "Maybe one reason replication has captured so much interest is the often-repeated idea that falsification is at the heart of the scientific enterprise."
-
This idea was popularized by Karl Popper's 1950s maxim that theories can never be proved, only falsified. Yet an overemphasis on repeating experiments could provide an unfounded sense of certainty about findings that rely on a single approach....
-
philosophers of science have moved on since Popper. Better descriptions of how scientists actually work include what epistemologist Peter Lipton called in 1991 "inference to the best explanation.""
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-01023-3 … -
Have you seen our animation to go with this?https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JEQ_tcweqz8 …
-
Wholesome
-
And awesome
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Probably a strategy that will not for work much longer now that it is "open" knowledge
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

