Everyone in computing sciences of course too, pretty much. I guess almost anybody who codes too... Hmmm. I'm seeing a pattern maybe?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is so field-dependent. Someone replicating my study would not be able to do it over the course of a 3-year PhD. Only just over 4 years.
-
The replication attempt doesn't have to be a study hard to replicate, if I understand
@dsquintana... -
But it should be of interest and utility to the PhD student. I really disagree with placing ticking-box exercises on PhD students and can't see how I would've fitted a relevant replication to my PhD timeline. It would mean not doing something else I've actually wanted to do
-
.
@hisotalus@o_guest@dsquintana

This is just the usual "how I think X shld be done is how the entire system must be structured & if you disagree you're destroying X" bullshittio. -
Yes! Exactly. There is no one way to do training. Science is not a monolith.
-
.
@o_guest@hisotalus@dsquintana Any assertion starting "Every PhD should include" is guaranteed self-aggrandizing bullshittio. -
For this assertion to be self-aggrandizing, that assumes I hold a position of power in the first place. I’m just an immigrant early career researcher with a temporary contract, so I basically have no power whatsoever

-
Me too, but I don't present a podcast that has been given to university students as material for a course, so you're definitely a level (or more) above me. LMAO
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems to be that way... I think this has always been a resource issue for most areas of the biobehavioral sciences, but many people now realize the importance of doing this, and this is being done via collaboration with other labs
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
