Stafford Lightman on the role of the reviewer: it is to ask “is this a good paper”. He makes the claim junior scientists may not be appropriate reviewers because they may just criticize it rather than ask if it is good quality for publication. Hmm 
-
-
Yeah sometimes it isn't about the quality of the paper. If it challenges the reviewers personal beliefs on a subject to much, they will be less inclined to give it a favorable review. I've noticed this trend is more common in older reviewers, ones who helped in creating a model.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
