-
-
So to answer
@EikoFried... didn't@lakens just say in this thread he prefers normative definitions?
And many do, and I can't blame them TBH. It's an appealing and simplifying way of speaking which can in many cases aid communication. -
They aid communication if they are clear, but the reproducibility/replicability distinction goes against common usage of common terms; it actually creates, rather than eliminates, communication issues. OTOH, "computational reproducibility" is clarifying.
-
I agree completely, IF clear and also dare I say IF the actual semantics have been figured out/formalised.
-
Why do you think it's more clear in computational work? I mean I feel like there was a sea of possible meanings when I and others wrote this in response to the title/question: "What is Computational Reproducibility?"...https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/1114564595832754176 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.