And to ensure that the optional lane assist is not just a stepping stone to mandatory self driving.
-
-
Replying to @bradpwyble @VandekerckhoveJ and
TBF if some "science" can easily be done by a robot, why not? It certainly won't be theory and model development though. LMAO
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @VandekerckhoveJ @o_guest and
Try making a robot do domain-general abduction as required for scientific reasoning & discovery. AI-hard, like everyday conversation and common sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @VandekerckhoveJ and
making a human do it is hard enough
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mattsiegel @IrisVanRooij and
Bit of an equivocation — that's not what I meant. If you believe somebody's job as a "scientist" can be done wholly by something programmed by a person in the present, like https://www.automaticstatistician.com/index/ for example, then it's a very different thing to "we're all robots".
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @mattsiegel and
For those who don't like clicking off Twitter: it "automatically produces a 10-15 page report describing patterns discovered in data [and] returns a statistical model with state-of-the-art extrapolation performance evaluated over real time series data sets from various domains".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest @mattsiegel and
I feel like somebody is going to come up with a conspiracy that I want to replace all non-modellers with robots (i.e., models) so modellers can fully rule the field. Very Stepford wives.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
We *ehem* need those. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
