There isn't something simple going on with modelling... as I explained many times (e.g., on this account: https://twitter.com/SfPRocur/status/1102957227906949121 …), the issues are very deep and nuanced when they exist AND modelleres already actually do a lot to address them.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
Anyway the police/city metaphor and the idea that a paper type can help modelling seems too off to me to be of use for modelling. As well as a bit off to be told what our work is like or what our environment is like from those who don't do modelling.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
I thought the point was to respect experts and modellers are experts not just on modelling itself but also how they and their work is treated by wider psych/cogsci/neurosci.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
Thanks for clarifying. I think we completely agree. Modeling expertise is a form of theorising and experts in modeling need to be part of any reform we might be undergoing. Mine is an argument for diversity in any reform process and I agree the city metaphor is inappropriate.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @o_guest and
One of my special skills is coming up with ideas that everyone hates. It’s harder than you might think.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @VandekerckhoveJ @chrisdc77 and
You mean authoritarianism is something that appeals to some over others? But it's an empirical issue as well: has authoritarian-flavoured science worked well in the past? I believe it hasn't because science isn't something that can be codified nor something monolithic.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I'm not sure what you think I said. But I certainly want to get my hands dirty and do.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.