I really like this way of thinking of it. I once joked we need a format where I can publish my model and how I think it would best be tested, so somebody else can do the testing!
-
-
@zerdeve@djnavarro I'm really curious to know if you agree with this framing - is a mature model/theory development paper akin to (a particular structure of) preregistration?2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @melissaekline @JCSkewesDK and
I can only say that I can follow
@JCSkewesDK’s reasoning and it makes sense to me. Though I’m pretty sure if we tried to put all modeling work in the same basket, it would be the same mistake as trying to impose an HD/NHST framing on it. Personally, I am happy without forcing >>1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @zerdeve @melissaekline and
categories on research. I think modeling is not a monolith but rather it is multifaceted and emergent. Let’s just see how it evolves and where it goes without imposing templates. I trust modelers will solve their own problems as problems arise and they already are. >>
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @zerdeve @melissaekline and
It’s important to recognize that the types of problems they run into will be different from those arising in the hypothesis testing context so that should not be taken as a reference to understand or evaluate modeling work.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @zerdeve @melissaekline and
Agree 100%. I recently used a simulation to draw out my readers intuition, without any intention of the model being testable. And your talk is another giod example. For me your talk felt genuinely philosophical.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JCSkewesDK @melissaekline and
That’s where I was coming from so happy to hear it came through. But honestly it’s hard to classify it as a certain type of modeling since it’s a mixture of many approaches.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zerdeve @JCSkewesDK and
Yeah, exactly. Modelling is a way of doing science. Not a tool like stats, for example. So it's multilithic.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
[I realise that's not a word that's the opposite of monolith. Also damn, I should have said polylith.]
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
The very idea should have many names! 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
