I did? I don't recall saying that. From memory, you did preface a question about whether RRs could prevent oversampling & deliberate data selection (which led to an interesting pt about p-hacking) by saying that RRs wouldn't be right for your work, and I didn't question that
-
-
Replying to @chrisdc77 @bradpwyble and
On the way to the station we (all three) were talking about why I don't pre-reg or RR my modelling work. Loukia said my work was exploratory modelling, I assume you agreed with that but tell me more. And I said it can be seen that a model is a pre-reg.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
She did? lol my memory... I do like the idea of thinking of generated models as preregistrations, which could potentially generate predictions testable by others. This seems noncontroversial to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @bradpwyble and
I don't think this is controversial in many circles, agreed. I think this is what modellers have been doing for a long time and continue to do and what we do at
@ReScienceEds where we literally publish replications of models.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
The reason in needs to be said is because I have seen some pretty bizarre stuff — mainly on Twitter — that made me go WTF. I get that non-modellers don't know what we do, and that's actually fine, but they need to let us explain our work more IMHO.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
Well I think it's good that you're speaking out about it. Personally, the part of all these discussions re reproducibility that I've enjoyed the most, since getting into this in 2013, is how it's widened my understanding of how different sciences work & what different fields need
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @o_guest and
I often feel like my discussions with you are going in a useful direction, vs sometimes it just seems like a merry go round in other groups, so thanks for being open minded.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @bradpwyble @o_guest and
Likewise, thanks man. I've learned an absolute TON on here -- more than I can even begin to summarise -- talking to people that I have no shame in admitting are a damn sight smarter & more knowledgeable than I am. And I'm trying as much as poss to turn that to something of use.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @bradpwyble and
FWIW I am really excited to listen to the talks from
#OpenScienceIMC. Will be a fun and I am sure enlightening experience. And, yes, I have to say I am always pleasantly surprised when these discussions go/end well as I have been in some absolutely pointless ones.1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
I'm thinking I should probably delete my account now and go out on a high.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
First I have to watch the completion of the slow motion brexit train wreck and I need twitter for that. Can't. Stop. Watching.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.