The phrase "hypothesis driven" is a term that has a lot baggage as the best kind of science. So even this revised slide has this property of advocating RR as the best kind of science.
-
-
What phrase would you use instead?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @bradpwyble and
Just wanna butt in to say great work to
@JCSkewesDK and@bradpwyble at explaining Danielle's research/point and why pre-reg and RR are not being situated correctly as a tool and why exploratory/confirmatory is not a/the real dissociation.1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
Now that would have been a great question to ask yesterday
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @bradpwyble and
I mean you kind of did answer it when I told you pre-reg doesn't work for my work you said my modelling is "exploratory", right? But I don't think it is, at least not the same way you would describe an analysis on data...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
I did? I don't recall saying that. From memory, you did preface a question about whether RRs could prevent oversampling & deliberate data selection (which led to an interesting pt about p-hacking) by saying that RRs wouldn't be right for your work, and I didn't question that
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @bradpwyble and
On the way to the station we (all three) were talking about why I don't pre-reg or RR my modelling work. Loukia said my work was exploratory modelling, I assume you agreed with that but tell me more. And I said it can be seen that a model is a pre-reg.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
Also of course
@LTzavella should have been tagged (sorry). To be clear, I am not sure we disagreed in person at all?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
I don't think we disagreed in person or on here tbh! *looks around slowly* Is this an argument?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @o_guest and
I remember for both! We all agreed that the modelling work you do (aka building new or *on* existing models) does not fall under the right category for pre-reg research - ie. hypothesis-testing :)
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Hahaha. Yes, exactly. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.