That disclaimer is not as helpful as you think it is because theory driven work falls under "hypothesis driven" and definitely not the bottom category.
-
-
Looking at the data and then creating the model is fine — I mean maybe even required. Unless you explicitly label the model as having been tested on the data is was used to be trained, for example, I don't think it's a problem.
-
This is why I am sceptical about the value of pre-reg and RR, not because I don't think they don't work in the appropriate context, but because I think the debate needs to move forward into nuance.
-
Don't disagree with any of that. Just because prereg/RRs are a hammer doesn't make everything a nail. Let the nuanced debate flourish.
-
Yes, you agreed with me, I think. Didn't mean to imply you didn't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.