Yes I've read that, it's impressive work. You know, rather than folks pushing back at RRs (& I don't mean you), I think we/they should use RRs as a proof of concept of how report types CAN diversify to fit specific needs, & on that basis launch as many additional modes as we need
-
-
That's a good point, as long as the RR's are framed that way, but often I see them framed as the right way to do science. You've leaned that way yourself in the past.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
My argument has been that they're the best way to do hypothesis-driven science where there is risk of bias. This slide has been in every long-form RR talk I've given since 2013.pic.twitter.com/wpE7a1FW5x
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
That disclaimer is not as helpful as you think it is because theory driven work falls under "hypothesis driven" and definitely not the bottom category.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'd actually argue you need a third category. As somebody who wants to move away from the H-D model.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Great, gimme a new slide. This one has been getting boring anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Just add: "formal theory development relying mainly on abductive inference" down the bottom and I think you're pretty good.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
This raises an interesting question. I'm not sure it's a good idea to put theory driven research in a separate category like this, especially since "hyp driven research" is emphasized by e.g. the NIH.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bradpwyble @JCSkewesDK and
The phrase "hypothesis driven" is a term that has a lot baggage as the best kind of science. So even this revised slide has this property of advocating RR as the best kind of science.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What phrase would you use instead?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Just wanna butt in to say great work to @JCSkewesDK and @bradpwyble at explaining Danielle's research/point and why pre-reg and RR are not being situated correctly as a tool and why exploratory/confirmatory is not a/the real dissociation.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @bradpwyble and
Now that would have been a great question to ask yesterday
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 16 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.