It's incoherent to describe a model of a social interaction as bio/neuro plausible. I don't even know what that would mean.
You can't model/capture/understand macroeconomics with cells or atoms or QM.
I and @ProfData (as well as many others) raise this.http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21397 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
Bridging levels, correctly percolating relevant information downwards or upwards within a system using levels of analysis, is important. Cognitive computational neuroscience modelling can only be useful if we understand levels/layers of abstraction. Otherwise what is modelled?
Show this thread -
I actually named my blog http://neuroplausible.com after this weasel word/phrase because I find the ironic use hilarious. Anyway, learn levels, friends. Start from Marr, if easiest/most accessible to you.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.