I did some work on this long ago, but from an associative learning perspective. I'm sure you can find more updated literature.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470218.2010.493615 …
-
-
Thank you both! May i ask whether you favour either exemplar or prototype theory?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CathrynTownsend @twitemp1
I'm a modeller. I favour what can help us give understanding to a system.
But! I know what you're asking! Exemplar theory (models built based on it) tends to give a better account of the data in many categorisation tasks though.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CathrynTownsend
If I am forced to choose, I 'd to go with exemplars, but I rather favour a simple associative account.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @CathrynTownsend
That paper is with freaking humans!

1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @CathrynTownsend
I never ever work with animal data.
Except the rats and the pigeons. They don't count because I don't ever touch them, right?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CathrynTownsend
hahahahaha. Give me 100 rats and pigs before a single human. They follow instructions!!! Pigs=pigeons, you would know this if you ever work with them
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @CathrynTownsend
Of course, but I actually just thought of
#ACAB instead. I guess Ⓐ ⚑...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CathrynTownsend
WTF are you talking about?
Ahhh! I think I gotcha! Pigs... these are telling Ⓐ ⚑...
Bofia, pasma, los grises, picoletos, cachacos, ....1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

