I definitely don’t think the same thoughts about what it means for science to be self-correcting (or not) as many seem to. Interesting.
-
-
It's serious because without understanding layers/levels of analysis/abstraction, you can't do this work. Same with computer science: YOU NEED LEVELS, but in that field they don't have this self-destructive denialism/ignorance at all.
-
As I said elsewhere, training for specialised mass production, with a necessarily narrow focus, has robbed the big picture. Without a broader perspective, there are no levels.
-
Hilarious that compscis are more broad!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.