I retweeted something like this before, and no one listened. Is no one concerned about a potentially biased AI vetting research? To me there's ethical issues in here that no one in the #openscience is talking about. Am I crazy?https://twitter.com/B_resnick/status/1100045608038084611 …
-
-
This is one good example of the kind of adverse consequences on scientific policies of the public display of the alleged crisis we have been doing. I've been warning about this for quite a long time now, but it is useless.
-
To be fair they’re trying to identify reproduceable claims, not necessarily good / bad sci but still, it’s going to get hyped and used in ways that I am afraid will do harm
-
Yes, agreed, I realize the limited scope of the approach very well, but see the words used in the tweet you quoted. As said, problem I see is in the framing, as with many of the open science discussions.
-
And the subsequent misuse indeed, which is hidden/justified via the framing.
-
Oh, my mistake, I thought I was responded in this thread:https://twitter.com/irisvanrooij/status/1100331328116006913?s=21 …
-
Misuse is precisely my concern. Sure, it is often an outcome of hype and pomp, but also of thoughtless public cries.
-
Me too
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.