It's a disastrous stance to take about a group that desperately needs good and accurate *science-based* care and information
-
-
Replying to @jessesingal
I'm gay and have no objection to trans rights. But we can't have feelings supercede science. Or theory trump reality. That's. ..ultimately not good for anyone. Also creepy, in a dystopic way.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @EvansTanya86 @jessesingal
Except she is a scientist and Jesse isn't? So why is a scientist anti-science? Because she disagrees with you?
2 replies 3 retweets 20 likes -
Jesse's comment that you're directly replying to isn't about Danielle, but about the nameless person referenced who is not described as a scientist. But I expect you already know that. He's made no comment about Danielle's science, just her telling others to not talk to him.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @shutter_j @o_guest and
Jesse is concern trolling. He’s inviting harassment of a trans scientist. She happens to be a methods expert. She is way more qualified than he is to speak on the methodological issues. He should listen to her concerns & try to learn from that, rather than pose as spokesperson.
4 replies 6 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @shutter_j and
Ah, great. Jesse came to his senses and deleted it.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @shutter_j and
Iris van Rooij Retweeted
Thought so too for a moment & was looking to see if he apologized, but instead seems to be doubling down & inserting a disingeneous representation into his TL. Seems to me he cares little about the feedback he’s receiving from scientists in his mentions. https://twitter.com/jessesingal/status/1099309412353748992?s=21 …
Iris van Rooij added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @o_guest and
*At least* that’s not directed at a single person.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @richarddmorey @o_guest and
True. Still a) it’s a misrepresentation of the situation, b) harm has been done (apology would be fitting), and c) there was a reason she asked him something which still gets ignored, despite her qualifications & expertise on the matter. I’m just sad that I‘m expecting too much.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @richarddmorey and
It seems that he now is retaliating by misrepresenting my words to his followers (only me so far, none of the other people who called him out), and has now blocked me from viewing his tweets (so I cannot know what follows). I am more than sad now.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I'm glad he blocked you at least. Means he probably won't interact with you again, which is a net good.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey and
Unless someone again delivers screencaps to him.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
