On principle, I agree and encourage. However there's a critical frequency, when exceeded I'm getting angry 
-
-
It critically depends on the quality of the questions as well-- specifically, whether the questions and discussion are more or less interesting than the talk itself.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
You can't know that if you derail the talk though and they don't get to say what they planned...
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @EJWagenmakers and
I worry where there is a seniority differential as well. The professors may well enjoy the discussion that ensues, but the nervous grad student misses out on the presentation they prepare.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @samhforbes @o_guest and
Good point. Not many people are confident enough to cut the proverbial "crap" in similar setting. A "nervous grad student" is just the most vivid example. We should teach healthy disregard for authority not obedience...
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @MaciekSzul @samhforbes and
Yes well at IU we all knew the culture. If you didn't get interrupted then you knew things went terribly, terribly wrong. It's a great way to have a deep understanding of the speakers perspective. Maybe not a great way to have an overview of a research project
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_a_c__ @samhforbes and
I'd love that (to a degree
). But I'm aware that many people wouldn't feel at all comfortable, because of the culture or personality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaciekSzul @samhforbes and
How does an invited speaker know the culture? I guess you explain it before the talk? How do you explain they might not get to their final slide?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @MaciekSzul and
As a speaker, I try to make sure that my main point is presented early. If the audience has to wait for the main conclusion until the last slide, then it's a poorly structured talk. It is not a movie with a sudden twist at the end.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EJWagenmakers @o_guest and
Wagenaar proposed the onion model of talks: each section provides a deeper layer, but reiterates the same point.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not sure we're on the same page here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.