On the other hand, I find it unforgivable in the age of google scholar, that someone didn't bother to use better search terms to cite relevant competing literature. Almost guaranteed that you can publish a "new" method in a place like Nat. Comm. without citing relevant sub-field.
-
-
Replying to @NeuroStats @IrisVanRooij and
Research in some areas, particularly those that are no longer fashionable is very often ignored by those who, being aware of it, have an interest to do so; as a consequence, young generations reinvent the wheel.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @twitemp1 @NeuroStats and
I doubt they can't do Google Scholar. I think it's something more systemic.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Maybe, but don't forget - "never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". Anyway, I have an early start with 2 young children, so I can't continue this interesting discussion. I look forward to >100 notifications in the morning!
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @aidanhorner @o_guest and
Good night Aidan! While you're off my first contribution to those 100 notifications will be this (I try to avoid ableist word): cluelessness can be one of the biggest malice. As if that isn't systematic. Most systematic problems don't come from outright malice but carelessness.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @aidanhorner and
I'm not saying there's malice. Just like the existence of sexisn in our doesn't mean I think everybody in it is evil.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
-
Replying to @IrisVanRooij @aidanhorner and
I find the dichotomy of malice vs ignorance (to avoid the ableist term) a misplaced thing when talking about systems. Science the system, the social enterprise, can't do either malice or ignorance. It's a system!
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @aidanhorner and
I agree that ignorance is not a system property, but a system can select for it or incentivize it (as per
@bradpwyble ‘s earlier tweet), and that in turn can in part uphold a system. As in circular causality.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Absolutely. And to be charitable to Aidan he means "people in the system". I would say though that it's not relevant for system-wide criticism to know either way. I have had experiences when I'm excluded or called people out and the reactions are very telling FWIW.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.