as I said at the very outset of this, I think there is clearly a *quantitative* distinction between modeling and experimental work. and that's because modeling work tends to make *relatively* more specific predictions. but there is huge variability.
-
-
Stop telling modelers to report irrelevant inferential stats in their papers that have nothing to add and only serve as a gatekeeping mechanism. We don't like it. We just do it because we're desperate to get published.
-
I've never done it myself, but it's so common. We all complain about and laugh about how non-modelers think try can tell us how to evaluate our models.
-
As
@tom_hartley has already done a great thread on how marginalised we are, I won't go into it, but seriously... Not every modeler is able to tell reviewers "no, I won't add an irrelevant ANOVA". In this thread you're talking to people who can, but ECRs need their papers, etc. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.