I am not sure science would have benefitted from a record of all the half-formed thoughts that went into the process. It's hard enough to understand the final product. 15/n
-
-
Not disagreeing, I think I’m just clueless about who they are.
-
No, I mean that is fair. I am just saying I don't think it's a secret cabal. It's an open thing discussed right in our/my face(s).
-
I don't think anybody is trying to make this topic personal, it wouldn't benefit anyone or the community. There are no individuals confabulated against theory and modelling but an attempt to impose to the psychology community in general rules that would be detrimental.
-
-
How many journals accept pure modelling papers? How many of them have they actually published? How many research councils accept modelling proposals? How much funding goes to modelling/theory?...
-
... OK modelling is cheap (i.e., very good value) but does your institution look at funding as a criterion for recruitment, retention, promotion of psychologists (mine does).
-
... how many of your colleagues actually do modelling research? When you think about these questions. IMO, theory/modelling are massively undervalued and marginalized in psychology.
-
and deeply misunderstood!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.