To all those who were arguing against open peer review because there is no evidence that open peer review improves review quality: There is evidence that open peer review improves review quality.https://twitter.com/_atanas_/status/1086785382199504896 …
-
-
Replying to @JPdeRuiter
I didn't see any people are arguing against open review because it doesn't improve review quality, but I am interested in knowing more. What do you mean by quality here?
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
For instance, this, from the abstract. For details, see the paper.pic.twitter.com/fPoVTb6Y12
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest
If you are not convinced by what is reported in the paper, I think that is an excellent question to address to the authors.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-08250-2#author-information …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JPdeRuiter
I'm more interested in your claims that people are arguing against open reviews based on quality? What have they been saying?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I didn't keep a formal record. The general argument I heard a lot (from memory) is that it will make reviews worse (because if published, people will be reluctant to be honest) and it will be harder to find reviewers.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.