Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
o_guest's profile
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
@o_guest

Tweets

Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ

@o_guest

• goth gremlin • computational cognitive/neuroscience modeling • geek & techish Cypriot • plant aficionada • came up with #bropenscience • http://neuroplausible.com  •

Τότεναμ, Λονδίνο & Cyprus
olivia.science
Joined October 2015

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. J.P. de Ruiter‏ @JPdeRuiter Jan 19
      • Report Tweet

      J.P. de Ruiter Retweeted Dr Atanas G Atanasov

      To all those who were arguing against open peer review because there is no evidence that open peer review improves review quality: There is evidence that open peer review improves review quality.https://twitter.com/_atanas_/status/1086785382199504896 …

      J.P. de Ruiter added,

      Dr Atanas G Atanasov @_atanas_
      The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals http://feeds.nature.com/~r/ncomms/rss/current/~3/ckRndT3xeqI/s41467-018-08250-2 …
      2 replies 12 retweets 23 likes
    2. Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest Jan 20
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @JPdeRuiter

      I didn't see any people are arguing against open review because it doesn't improve review quality, but I am interested in knowing more. What do you mean by quality here?

      2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
    3. J.P. de Ruiter‏ @JPdeRuiter Jan 20
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @o_guest

      For instance, this, from the abstract. For details, see the paper.pic.twitter.com/fPoVTb6Y12

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest Jan 20
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @JPdeRuiter

      How did they measure objectivity?

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. J.P. de Ruiter‏ @JPdeRuiter Jan 20
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @o_guest

      If you are not convinced by what is reported in the paper, I think that is an excellent question to address to the authors.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-08250-2#author-information …

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest Jan 20
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @JPdeRuiter

      I'm more interested in your claims that people are arguing against open reviews based on quality? What have they been saying?

      8:47 AM - 20 Jan 2019
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. J.P. de Ruiter‏ @JPdeRuiter Jan 20
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @o_guest

          I didn't keep a formal record. The general argument I heard a lot (from memory) is that it will make reviews worse (because if published, people will be reluctant to be honest) and it will be harder to find reviewers.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Jordan Anaya‏ @OmnesResNetwork Jan 20
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @JPdeRuiter @o_guest

          I think this is a legitimate concern. Some of the reviews I've read at F1000Research have been puff pieces. I'm not sure if that's because the review is public or because the manuscript is basically already published.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. J.P. de Ruiter‏ @JPdeRuiter Jan 20
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @OmnesResNetwork @o_guest

          I suspect it could well be the latter.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Jordan Anaya‏ @OmnesResNetwork Jan 20
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @JPdeRuiter @o_guest

          Yes...if your role is as a gatekeeper you're incentivized to keep the gate closed.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest Jan 20
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @OmnesResNetwork @JPdeRuiter

          The data seems to suggest if I understand correctly that open reviews, in their sample so this comes with many caveats, are more likely to be accept.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Jordan Anaya‏ @OmnesResNetwork Jan 20
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @o_guest @JPdeRuiter

          Figure 4 seems to show that people are more likely to reveal their identity if they wrote a positive review. I'm curious what the results would be if people had to decide before they wrote their review whether to reveal their identity.pic.twitter.com/tYVLUpSKpU

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        8. Jordan Anaya‏ @OmnesResNetwork Jan 20
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @OmnesResNetwork @o_guest @JPdeRuiter

          If people are forced to reveal their identities I could see that changing reviewer behavior, but if you select on the people who know going in that they are going to reveal their identity no matter what I could see no effect there.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest Jan 20
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @OmnesResNetwork @JPdeRuiter

          I would imagine powerful people would have no effect, maybe, while junior people would write more positive reviews. It's scary knowing they will know you told them it's shitty, reject it.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        10. 1 more reply

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info