Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
o_guest's profile
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
@o_guest

Tweets

Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ

@o_guest

• goth gremlin • computational cognitive/neuroscience modeling • geek & techish Cypriot • plant aficionada • came up with #bropenscience • http://neuroplausible.com  •

Τότεναμ, Λονδίνο & Cyprus
olivia.science
Joined October 2015

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Chris Chambers‏Verified account @chrisdc77 Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @richarddmorey @ingorohlfing @Psychonomic_Soc

      FWIW my experience (over & over) editing @regreports is that the format provides no barriers to reporting exploratory analyses. RRs usually report them in abundance & authors can be required to do them where they are necessary to support conclusions (e.g. confirming robustness).

      2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
    2. Chris Chambers‏Verified account @chrisdc77 Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @chrisdc77 @richarddmorey and

      Also: even if the Stage 2 review process didn't help enforce rigour in terms of robustness (which imo it does), there is little incentive anyway for authors to underreport on vital exploratory analyses because the outcomes of any analysis do not influence the editorial decision.

      2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
    3. Chris Chambers‏Verified account @chrisdc77 Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @chrisdc77 @richarddmorey and

      So for me, I would need to see some concrete evidence that the concerns you outline actually manifest in RRs before I see this as something to worry about. With vanilla prereg, I think your case may be stronger, though again, the review process should help.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Daniël Lakens‏Verified account @lakens Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @chrisdc77 @richarddmorey and

      Daniël Lakens Retweeted Daniël Lakens

      I preregistered this would be the response.https://twitter.com/lakens/status/1083423995834363906?s=19 …

      Daniël Lakens added,

      Daniël LakensVerified account @lakens
      Any improvement in science that becomes popular will lead to a published article that suggests X will not solve all our problems. Unless people provide concrete real-life examples and a cost-benefit analysis of the problems, articles criticizing X probably mean X is good.
      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    5. Richard D. Morey‏ @richarddmorey Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @lakens @chrisdc77 and

      I did not claim that anyone claimed that pre-reg would "would not solve all our problems". The requirement of cost-benefits analysis is ridiculous when my goal is not to KEEP people from pre-reg, but rather to articulate and help avoid a particular issue.

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    6. Richard D. Morey‏ @richarddmorey Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @richarddmorey @lakens and

      Given how people tend to use p values rigidly, you should recognise the need for reminding people to have some nuance when using new tools. If one warns against naïve use of hard decision rules, that doesn't mean one is arguing against significance testing.

      1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
    7. Richard D. Morey‏ @richarddmorey Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @richarddmorey @lakens and

      Given the history of statistical practice, I think there's plenty of reason to worry that people will be rigid. Let's help avoid that future by first considering it a possibility.

      3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. Gordon Pennycook‏ @GordPennycook Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @richarddmorey @lakens and

      A similar point was made by @TrishaVZ at Psychonomics. I don't think we have to worry one iota about people *not* exploring their data. I'm confident that everyone I know does it. Do you know of anyone who doesn't?

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Richard D. Morey‏ @richarddmorey Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @GordPennycook @lakens and

      I have been sent data by people who did not explore their data in the right way to find critical issues with their analysis, yes. Their analysis was dependent on not having seen something important that invalidated their results.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Richard D. Morey‏ @richarddmorey Jan 16
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @richarddmorey @GordPennycook and

      Based on my experience being sent data sets, I believe a lack of robust checking to be the default (indeed, most people's tools, e.g., SPSS, don't really allow very much of it or make it difficult)

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest Jan 17
      • Report Tweet
      Replying to @richarddmorey @GordPennycook and

      Same here. Modelling people's data I realise my computational models are showing stuff about the data that means the experiment don't mean what the authors hoped/think. (Manuscripts still in pre-preprint format for good examples of this, but obviously will share when ready.)

      12:13 AM - 17 Jan 2019
      • 5 Likes
      • Adam Osth Sam Forbes Dr. Christina Bergmann Dominic Mussack Prof. Tom Crick
      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
        1. Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ‏ @o_guest Jan 17
          • Report Tweet
          Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey and

          Not that I'm the only person that's done this, of course. Pretty standard stuff throughout comp modelling and of the reasons why it's such a powerful way to do science.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2019 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info